Skip to main content

Is Government Above the Safety Law?

The compliance double standard in the South African State, and what ordinary citizens can do about it.

Every South African has stood in a government queue and felt it. The crowded corridor. The blocked exit. The wiring that looks like it was last touched before democracy. We expect the State to be the example of compliance. Too often it operates as the exception.

Meanwhile, a private factory in Durban gets a visit from an inspector and is expected to have its fire equipment tagged, its electrical certificate current and its evacuation plan on the wall. Same country. Same Act. Very different outcomes.

The law has no exemption for the State

The Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993 binds the State. Government departments, hospitals, police stations and municipal offices are employers, and employers have duties.

  • Section 8 requires a safe and healthy workplace for employees.
  • Sections 17, 18 and 19 require health and safety representatives and committees at workplaces with more than 20 employees. A police station with 50 staff or a hospital with 500 is well past that line.
  • The Electrical Installation Regulations require a valid Certificate of Compliance (COC) for every electrical installation, whoever owns the building.

Section 9: the forgotten mandate

This is the part most people have never heard of. Section 9 says an employer must also protect persons other than employees who may be affected by the work being done.

When you queue at Home Affairs, wait in a clinic or collect a grant at a pay point, you are one of those persons. The State has a legal duty to keep you safe while you are there. If the public is on the premises, the duty is not optional.

The enforcement paradox

If the law is so clear, why do the problems stay? Part of the answer is politics.

A Department of Labour inspector can issue a fine to a small business with little political friction. Serving a prohibition notice on a government department that delivers services to thousands of people is a different matter. Nobody wants to be the person who shut down a pay point. So the notice rarely comes, and unsafe facilities stay open.

The tender trap: Regulation 5

On construction sites, the Construction Regulations put heavy duties on the client. A client is expected to prepare a health and safety specification, appoint a Professional Construction Health and Safety Agent (PrCHSA), approve the contractor's safety file and make sure audits happen.

On many state projects the process stops at a sentence in the tender document: "contractor must work safe." The file sits unread. No agent is appointed. No one audits. If a contractor falls from an unprotected scaffold, the client still carries responsibility, and on a government project that client is the department.

Why it keeps happening

  1. Budget. Money is allocated for bricks. A safety agent is seen as an extra cost.
  2. Competence. Project managers are not safety professionals, so they do not know what to demand in a specification.
  3. Consequence. When a CEO is negligent and a worker dies, criminal prosecution is a real possibility. When a government official is negligent, the matter tends to be referred to another internal committee.

A reform blueprint

None of this requires a new law. It requires the existing one to be applied to the State. Four practical changes would move things quickly:

  1. The Treasury rule. No government construction tender is awarded without a PrCHSA appointment letter and a client safety specification. No agent, no tender.
  2. A ring-fenced budget. Five percent of every public works project budget protected for safety compliance: COC renewals, risk assessments and independent audits.
  3. A public sector inspectorate. A dedicated unit in the Department of Labour whose only job is inspecting state buildings and publishing the findings.
  4. Citizen action under PAIA. Which brings us to you.

What you can do this week

The Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) lets any person request records from a public body. A COC, an evacuation plan and safety committee minutes are exactly the kind of records a compliant workplace can produce quickly.

  1. Pick a facility you use: a municipal office, clinic or police station.
  2. Submit a written PAIA request to the information officer for the specific records.
  3. Allow the statutory response time, which is 30 days under PAIA.
  4. If the records cannot be produced, you have learned something important. Share what you find.

Think you know the OHS Act?

We turned this article into a 10-question quiz. Find it on our TikTok and tell us your score in the comments.

Safety in the State, goes deeper into every point above. Pre-order details are coming soon.

There is only one OHS Act. It is time the State complies. Government must stop saying "contractor must work safe" and start saying "we will ensure they work safe."

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Skill No Safety Training Teaches (But Every Great Safety Officer Has)

Most Safety Officers are tolerated - not trusted. Where do you stand? Take this free quiz to uncover your credibility, leadership level, and what's holding you back. It's not your NEBOSH certificate. It's not your incident reporting skills. It's storytelling — and it might be the most powerful tool you're not using. Think back to your last toolbox talk or safety briefing. How many people were really listening? Not just nodding along. Actually  listening  — making eye contact, leaning in, taking it seriously. If that number is lower than you'd like, you're not alone. And the reason probably isn't your knowledge. You know the regulations. You know the risks. You've done the checklists. The problem is that  facts inform. Stories move people. And most safety officers were never taught how to tell a story. Why Data Alone Doesn't Change Behaviour Here's the thing: when you tell a crew that "87% of hand injuries happen in the first ...

Why Safety Officers Make Poor Decisions Under Pressure (And How to Improve)

  Learn why Safety Officers make poor decisions under pressure and how to improve judgement, leadership, and workplace safety using practical tools, scenarios, and checklist. Why Safety Officers Make Poor Decisions Under Pressure  Many workplace incidents are not caused by a lack of rules. They happen because someone made the wrong decision under pressure. Examples include: Ignoring a hazard to save time Continuing work without PPE Signing permits without checking controls Staying silent when unsafe behaviour is visible These are decision failures. Why This Happens 1. Production Pressure Deadlines and targets often push people to choose speed over safety. 2. Fear of Conflict Many safety professionals know the correct action but hesitate to challenge senior staff. 3. Unsafe Habits Become Normal If shortcuts happen often without consequences, people start believing they are safe. 4. Lack of Confidence Some Safety Officers understand compliance but struggle in real-time leadershi...

Safe by Design: Building Safety in Before the Risk Ever Shows Up

Why zero injuries doesn't mean zero risk. Learn the Safe by Design approach — plus download our free practical guide to get started.  Most workplace safety conversations start after something has already gone wrong — an incident report, a near miss, a machine that's injured someone. Safe by Design flips that script entirely. Instead of controlling hazards after equipment, processes, or workplaces are built, Safe by Design asks a simpler question upfront: can we design this hazard out before it ever exists? For OHS practitioners, employers, and training providers across South Africa, this shift matters. It moves safety from being a compliance afterthought to being a design decision — made at the drawing board, not the incident register. Free Guide: Safe by Design This post is the short version. Our free 10-page guide walks through the full lifecycle approach, the business case, and a practical implementation checklist you can start using this month. Download the free guide → Wh...